Just got back from watching Dubya’s address to Congress. Scariest points for me:
- Appointment of a ‘Secretary of Homeland Security’
- Law enforcement to be given whatever it needs to combat terrorism
- Any government that aids terrorists is to be considered a hostile one.
Like the US has never supported terrorism. Oh, sorry, if the US is supporting them, then they’re ‘freedom fighters’ not terrorists.
To say nothing of the scariness of law enforcement being given whatever it needs, or at least whatever it says it needs, to combat terrorism. I guess that does mean that encryption will be illegal soon.
Let’s all take a moment to look forward to the time when ‘terrorism’ comes to mean ‘whatever the current administration doesn’t like’. I reckon a (sick, twisted) case could be made now that copyright violation constitutes terrorism. You’re depriving so-called innocents of their right to make money, and forcing them to live in fear that you might steal their ‘intellectual property’. Obviously, then, breaking copyright is terrorism, and thus can be punished to the fullest extent under the funky new anti-terrorism laws.
Maybe I’m being grossly cynical, but the current hyper-legalism style of government really does lend itself to this kind of manipulation.
I think I’ll take a break and calm down.